Sunday, November 18, 2007

Poorly written article proposes that Hillary's being a bitch is a good thing

Argov's poorly thought piece is an example of pure Clintonian drivel. It all depends on what the definition of "bitch" is. She doesn't want to admit that the word has more than one meaning, so she assumes that "bitch" only means "good and tough." But it also means "female asshole."

It's not a question of whether Hilllary is a b--ch, but to whom* and why. Hillary is a b--ch for her own benefit, not for the benefit of those she represents.**

I'm 100% certain that Margaret Thatcher was called a b--ch (definition: complimentary) tough, good leader) because she was tough when the situation demanded it. This is being "tough," although Argov intends to confuses the reader by equating it with acting like a b--ch. (i.e."Tough women are often called b--ches, and HC is often called a b--ch, therefore, she must be a tough leader and hence, would be good for the country.")

Hillary's problem is that she is a b--ch when being a b--ch isn't necessary. She's a b--ch (definition: (insult) selfish, mean, vile, petty, power-hungry person. Female asshole) to satisfy her own purposes.

Bonus: She is also Bill's b--ch (definition: fool) for putting up with his multiple public daliancesand not leaving him as a good, self-respecting woman would have. And hilariously, he is her b--ch in return. What a good, healthy relationship that one is.


* In the last 15 years HC has been a bitch to
a) her political enemies,
b) the military,
c) anyone who opposes her,
d) anyone she has no further use for,
e) her staff and "underlings." (That's always a good sign, isn't it? Being cruel to those beneath you?)

** Argov assumes that if elected, she'd suddenly turn the power of her bitchness against our enemies, who are
a) Islamo-fascists, to whom she sometimes joins with other Dems in giving moral support with their "anti-Bush's war" diatribes and demands for a "surrender" date,
b) the Chi-coms, to whom her husband gave the military technologies for multiple-warhead missiles and non-cavitating propellers for submarines and from whom much money flows,
c) North Korea, to whom Bill gave nuclear technology, so long as they pinky-swear-promised not to build the nuclear weapons they now have, and
d) internal enemies like the 16 FALN and Mecheteros(sp?) gang members Bill pardoned to help her gain votes in NY.


No. If elected, she'll stay the same as she always has been: friendly to whoever can
help her with money, power, or votes. And she'll still be a b--ch to anyone in her way, or simply because she has the power to be an arbitrary b---h.

But Argov believes that once elected she'll turn 180 degrees and be a b--ch for the benefit of the country and not herself. Argov is an idiot. To answer the rhetorical question in her book's title, some men marry "b--ches" for the same reason some women marry jerks. They're stupid and have no self-respect.

A point-by-point rebuttal of Argov's insipid "ettiquette for bitches":
* Remember that each time you are called a bitch on the campaign trail... it means that some other poor woman is getting a break from being called one.
SO... I CAN'T USE THE SAME PEJORATIVE ON TWO PEOPLE ON THE SAME DAY? YOU'RE AN IDIOT. HARRY REID IS AN IDIOT. OOPS, SO MUCH FOR "ARGOV'S FIRST LAW OF INSULTS."

* Lead with compassion for your male counterparts. Many still suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and night sweats, even though it's been decades since the feminist movement.
HC HAS AS MUCH COMPASSION AS A NILE MONITOR, BUT ISN'T AS WARM-HEARTED.

HERE'S A SURPRISE FOR YOU, ARGOV: MOST MEN I KNOW (MINUS THE EFFEMINATE ONES) ARE BOTHERED BY YOUR "FEMINIST MOVEMENT" LESS THAN WE ARE BY 1920's PROHIBITION. WHY? BECAUSE IT'S EVEN LESS RELEVENT TO US THAN PROHIBITION, WHICH ENDED SEVEN DECADES AGO. GET OVER YOURSELF.

* Wear skirts often. It'll flummox them even more.
NOW I'M SCARED. THAT'S MORE FRIGHTENING TO A HEALTHY MAN THAN YOU EVER DREAMED YOUR "FEMINIST MOVEMENT" WAS.

And one final word from the trenches. Being a woman who is running for office is sometimes threatening to those who aren't used to seeing women be productive outside the kitchen and the laundry room. The good news is, they'll adjust. Ain't that a bitch?
I THOUGHT I DISAPPROVE OF HC BECAUSE SHE'S DESPICABLE AS A PERSON AND AS A POLITICIAN. THANKS FOR SHOWING ME THAT FACT ABOUT MYSELF, LITTLE LADY. NOW GO GET ME A BEER.